CrossRoads RV Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > CrossRoads Owners Club > General RV Questions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - High profile - gas mileage
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

High profile - gas mileage

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
calliopeguy View Drop Down
Forum Seasonal Camper
Forum Seasonal Camper


Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Location: Mankato, Mn
Status: Offline
Points: 293
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote calliopeguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: High profile - gas mileage
    Posted: 02 Dec 2010 at 10:55am
I noticed on some of the threads there was discussions on gas mileage on the new Cruisers that are 5" higher to reduce the step in the bedroom. It seems most people are under the assumption that you will save a lot of gas if you pull a mid-profile. I have pulled high profiles for the past 15 years and when I compare mileage with people pulling mid-profile or even travel trailers there is no clear difference. I have noticed when I pull my tandem utility trailer the mileage is about as bad as pulling my 5th wheel. Has anybody else got any input to the myth "Hi-profile means less gas mileage?" 

Edited by calliopeguy - 02 Dec 2010 at 10:56am
Ken and Renee
2012 Cruiser CF325CKP
2010 Ford F-350 6.4 SB 4wd
W0CSC
Semper Fi 59-63
Back to Top
mbinohio View Drop Down
Forum Full Time Camper
Forum Full Time Camper


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Location: Amherst, Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 644
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mbinohio Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Dec 2010 at 11:31am
my PP is 13'4" to the top of the 2nd A/C unit, I pull with a soon to be gone 6.0 Ford it has 4.10 gears and I don't relly think my mileage is much difference with or without the camper, I get about 10.5 either way...I only use the truck to tow, I did have a cruiser and the mileage was the same,
2006 Paradise Pointe 35SL
2004 Ford F-350 CC dually 4X4
Back to Top
Hunter11 View Drop Down
Forum Full Time Camper
Forum Full Time Camper
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Status: Offline
Points: 4880
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hunter11 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Dec 2010 at 11:35am
I can tell you we towed an 05 Cruiser 29RK (mid profile) and now a PP (high profile) and with the same truck at 60 mph I would get 12 to 13 mpg pulling the Cruiser and I get 10 to 11 mpg pulling the PP. Now granted the PP does weigh a little more than our Crusier did but I think the profile has more to do with the loss of mileage than the weight did. I have tested the mileage on the same road we travel to get to some friends property we go to several times a year so the figures are based off that route.
12 Chevy 3500 DRW 4X4
07 Paradise Pointe 34CK
2013 Honda Foreman 500 ES
2 Mini Dachshunds

Back to Top
Old Farmer View Drop Down
Forum Full Time Camper
Forum Full Time Camper
Avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2007
Location: WI.
Status: Offline
Points: 2288
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Old Farmer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Dec 2010 at 12:19pm
I like Keith's answer! If you stop and think about it---A higher rig is going to be pushing more wind. Plain and simple. You guys that are wondering about it, just stop and think about the times you pulled into a really stiff head wind or one that hits you on one of the front "corners". It's about the same theory as higher verses lower. Either way it amounts to more wind resistance, and less fuel mileage.

08 CF26RK
2013 Ford f150 Eco Boost
Reese Select 16K
Back to Top
fhenn View Drop Down
Forum Full Time Camper
Forum Full Time Camper
Avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Location: Jackson, Ms
Status: Online
Points: 2124
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fhenn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Dec 2010 at 3:12pm
I agree with Keith and Lloyd, When we had the Zinger travel Trailer, I got worse gas milage than I do with our Cruiser, some of it might have to do with the aro dynamics of the front cap over the bed. But I had to pull half a dozen Fema Trailers this year for a friend, and the fuel mileage there was way down compared to the Cruiser
Frank and Janet Henn
2008 CF32Bl pushing a 2007 Dodge
CDT with a six speed Automatic
Traveling with Hoover and Rainbow the wonder dogs and now with Sunshine the rescue Schnauzer.
Back to Top
rcflyer View Drop Down
Forum Seasonal Camper
Forum Seasonal Camper


Joined: 15 Jul 2009
Location: Idaho
Status: Offline
Points: 273
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rcflyer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Dec 2010 at 6:58pm
In my mind it is a no brainer.  The more wind resistance the lower the mpg will be.  I chose my Cruiser mostly in that it was less than 12 feet tall.  Am able to store it in my shop building that has a 12 foot high door.  The dressing area of my bedroom in my 26RK is 6'5".  Good enough for most american men.  The lowest in the main area is 6'11".  The main thing that would help our problem would for the trucks to go back to the bed levels of 30 years ago.  I do not understand the race to have the tallest truck bed rail.  Lowering the bed rail height would allow the 5th wheels to have a higher bedroom ceiling with less overall heigth.
Back to Top
Hunter11 View Drop Down
Forum Full Time Camper
Forum Full Time Camper
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Status: Offline
Points: 4880
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hunter11 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Dec 2010 at 7:11pm
I'll be honest, if we could find a mid-profile 5th wheel in the 34' to 36' range with 3 to 4 sildeouts and W/D connections for a stacked unit we would go back in a minute. We are at 13'4" at the front AC unit with the trailer hooked to the truck and we had to go under a bridge one time that was 13'6". We made it okay but it took about 20 miles for my butt to turn loose of the seat fabric in my truck. The Crusier had plenty of head room for us and an extra couple of miles to the gallon now days would be nice.
12 Chevy 3500 DRW 4X4
07 Paradise Pointe 34CK
2013 Honda Foreman 500 ES
2 Mini Dachshunds

Back to Top
fhenn View Drop Down
Forum Full Time Camper
Forum Full Time Camper
Avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Location: Jackson, Ms
Status: Online
Points: 2124
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fhenn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Dec 2010 at 8:30pm
No they keep making the beds taller so they can have bragging rights on payload area (IE Cubic feet in the bed. 
Frank and Janet Henn
2008 CF32Bl pushing a 2007 Dodge
CDT with a six speed Automatic
Traveling with Hoover and Rainbow the wonder dogs and now with Sunshine the rescue Schnauzer.
Back to Top
geondebi View Drop Down
Forum Full Time Camper
Forum Full Time Camper
Avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Location: San Diego CA
Status: Offline
Points: 724
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote geondebi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Dec 2010 at 9:24pm
I agree with all on the drag.  It looks like the newer cruisers are are more rounded in the front to make the drag less.  My PP is like a big box on wheels.   I have seen other makes with the more aerodynamic front ends so may be this will be the future.  But then again we stick air vents and A/c on the roof that blocks the airflow over the top.  Also the higher the bedroom gets more storage goes under it.


George and Debi
Heidi (mini Dachshund)
2006 F250 PSD, 2005 PF30CK
Loving retirement more every day.
Back to Top
dalemac377 View Drop Down
Forum Full Time Camper
Forum Full Time Camper


Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Location: Bradley, Il
Status: Online
Points: 1101
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dalemac377 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Dec 2010 at 10:53pm
I'll Keep my "old" Patriot edition Cruiser. I have modified the bedroom floor with carpeted fillers so the floor is level all around the bed. That was most important along with the true mid-profile height. I've never towed a high profile 5'er, but I have to believe if you have more square feet of frontal area you will have more drag on the tow vehicle. JMHO.
Dale & Carol
2007 F-250
2010 CF30SK Patriot
2007 CF30SK
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 10.12
Copyright ©2001-2012 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.